"White Collar" and "Blue Collar" are popular distinctions of work, but have you heard of "Pink Collar"?

Pink Collar jobs are occupations held traditionally by women - hairdressers, secretaries, teachers, nurses - and are associated with lower pay, less respect, and fewer advancement opportunities.

Coined in 1967 by William Jack Baumla, and popularized by Louise Kapp Howe in 1977, "pink collar" was meant to categorize work that was seen as an extension of traditional domestic responsibilities (Howe, 1977).

The Origins and Evolution of Pink Collar Work

For decades, gender has shaped workforce structures, with men occupying higher-paid, leadership roles while women often performed service-based jobs. In Louise Howe's Pink Collar Workers: Inside the World of Women's Work, she describes how despite requiring significant skill and responsibility, pink-collar jobs frequently pay less than male-dominated occupations with similar education and experience requirements (Howe, 1977).

One reason is the persistent cultural belief that women's work - especially caregiving, education, and administrative support - is an extension of their expected domestic responsibilities. This assumption undervalues the work done in these roles, keeping wages low and limiting career progression (Howe, 1977).

The Glass Escalator: How Men Rise Faster in Pink Collar Jobs

Sociologist Christine Williams introduced the concept of the "Glass Escalator" to describe how men in female-dominated fields are often fast-tracked to leadership roles. Unlike the well-known "Glass Ceiling," which prevents women from rising in male-dominated professions, the Glass Escalator benefits men by propelling them into managerial positions in pink-collar sectors.

For example, in nursing, a field traditionally dominated by women, male nurses are disproportionately promoted to supervisory roles. The same trend is evident in education, where male teachers are more likely to become principals. This creates an additional barrier for women, as leadership roles remain elusive even within professions they dominate numerically (Williams, 1992).

Pay Disparities: Comparing Similar Jobs by Gender

Despite requiring comparable education and responsibilities, jobs dominated by women consistently pay less than those dominated by men. The Bureau of Labor Statistics provides striking examples:

• Information Technology (IT) managers, a male-dominated profession, earn a median salary that is 27% higher than Human Resources (HR) managers, a profession primarily made up of women.
• Janitors, who are typically men, earn 22% more than maids and housecleaners, who are mostly women, despite performing similar labor-intensive work. (US BLS)

Research published in the journal Social Forces further confirms this pattern. A study analyzing U.S. census data from 1950 to 2000 found that as more women entered certain professions, wages in those occupations declined—even when accounting for education, experience, and skill level. This suggests that society devalues work as soon as it becomes associated with women (Levanon, England, & Allison, 2009).

Breaking the Cycle: What Can Be Done?

Addressing the pink-collar pay gap requires a multi-faceted approach:

Policy Interventions - Governments and organizations must enforce pay equity laws and ensure that jobs requiring similar skills receive fair compensation, regardless of gender.

Workplace Culture Shifts - Employers should actively challenge gender biases in promotions and salary structures, recognizing the value of pink-collar professions.

Encouraging Men to Enter Pink Collar Jobs Without Gender Bias - By reducing stigma around men working in female-dominated industries, these professions can gain higher status and pay.

Public Awareness and Advocacy - Recognizing and addressing the undervaluation of pink-collar jobs can drive social change and lead to fairer pay structures.

The undervaluation of pink-collar jobs continues to be a pressing issue that perpetuates gender wage gaps. By recognizing these disparities and pushing for systemic change, we can work toward a more equitable workforce where pay and career advancement are based on skills and experience, rather than gender.

It's time to challenge outdated perceptions and push for greater recognition and compensation for traditionally female-dominated professions. Whether through policy, workplace culture, or advocacy, everyone has a role to play in ensuring gender equality in the workforce.

_{Howe, Louise Kapp. Pink Collar Workers: Inside the World of Women's Work. Avon Books, 1977.}

_{Levanon, Asaf, Paula England, and David Allison. "Occupational Feminization and Pay: Assessing Causal Dynamics Using 1950–2000 U.S. Census Data." Social Forces, vol. 88, no. 2, 2009}

_{U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Occupational Employment and Wages." Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024, www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat39.htm.}

_{Williams, Christine. "The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the 'Female' Professions." Social Problems, vol. 39, no. 3, 1992}

WCorp's Commitment to Progress 

At WCorp, we're committed to accelerating this progress in 2025. Our goals include:

1. Fully launching our AI-powered gender equity solution, ROI Genie, to help businesses implement and measure the impact of gender equality initiatives.
2. Expanding our global network of WCorp Ambassadors to spread our message and support businesses worldwide.
3. Certifying even more incredible companies across the globe, recognising their commitment to creating supportive workplaces for women.

By working together, we can transform workplaces, drive innovation, and unlock the $12 trillion economic opportunity that gender equality represents. 

Share this post with your colleagues and team to inspire and educate about the remarkable journey of women in business. And join us in shaping a future where every woman can thrive in business.